+86 137 5010 5351
EN
March. 30, 2026
When designing parts, do you often encounter situations where the machined parts do not match your expectations? Are you frustrated that unreasonable designs cause machining costs to far exceed your budget? Do you want to understand which design features are easy to machine and which will significantly increase costs? Do you want to know how to prepare for subsequent machining during the design phase?
Design is the first step that determines the success or failure of CNC machining. Good design not only ensures part functionality but also significantly reduces machining difficulty, shortens lead times, and controls costs. Unreasonable design, on the other hand, can lead to parts that cannot be machined, excessive deformation, or even scrap. Statistics show that optimizing during the design phase can reduce machining costs by 20-50%.
This article systematically introduces the design principles and best practices for CNC machining, helping you avoid common issues during the design phase, optimize part structures, and achieve the perfect balance between functionality and cost.
DFM (Design for Manufacturability) refers to fully considering the feasibility and economy of manufacturing processes during the product design phase, making the designed parts easy to machine, assemble, and control for quality. The core principle of DFM is: design should be as simple as possible while meeting functional requirements.
A good DFM design means that parts can be machined using standard tools, standard processes, and standard equipment, without requiring special fixtures, custom tools, or repeated adjustments.
Design directly affects CNC machining costs in the following ways:
· Machining Time: Complex designs require more programming time, setup time, and cutting time. A design requiring multiple tool changes and multiple setups can take several times longer than a simple design.
· Tooling Costs: Special shapes require custom tools, increasing costs. Standard tools are inexpensive, while custom tools can cost thousands of dollars.
· Setup Count: Designs requiring multiple setups increase labor costs and precision risks. Each setup requires alignment and can introduce errors.
· Material Waste: Unreasonable material selection or structural design can cause material waste. For example, a part that could be cut from sheet stock designed to be milled from a solid block results in significant material waste.
· Scrap Rate: Difficult-to-machine designs lead to higher scrap rates. Thin-walled parts, deep cavities, and sharp internal corners are all features prone to machining failure.
DFM optimization during the design phase typically reduces machining costs by 20-50%. This is because:
· Early identification and correction of design issues avoid later mold modifications or rework
· Simplified structures reduce machining steps
· More suitable materials and processes can be selected
· Lead times are shortened
A typical example: a part originally requiring multiple setups and custom tools, after DFM optimization, can be completed in one setup using standard tools, reducing costs by over 40%.
Simplicity is the core principle of DFM. The simpler the design, the easier the machining and the lower the cost.
· Minimize the number of parts by combining multiple parts into a single integrated structure. This not only reduces machining costs but also assembly costs.
· Avoid unnecessary complex surfaces and features. Every additional feature increases machining time.
· Use standard dimensions (such as standard drill diameters, standard thread sizes). Standard dimensions mean standard tools can be used without customization.
· Symmetrical designs can reduce the number of setups. Symmetrical parts can have multiple faces machined in one setup.
Tolerances are a key factor affecting machining costs. Each tightening of a tolerance grade can increase costs by 30-100%.
· Only specify tight tolerances where functionally necessary. For example, bearing mounting surfaces require tight tolerances, while cosmetic surfaces can use general tolerances.
· Use ISO 2768-mK general tolerances for non-critical dimensions. This is the most common default tolerance standard, avoiding unnecessary precision requirements.
· Each tightening of a tolerance grade significantly increases costs. Tightening from ±0.1mm to ±0.05mm increases costs by about 30-50%; tightening from ±0.05mm to ±0.01mm increases costs by about 100-200%.
Tools need sufficient space to reach all features that require machining.
· Ensure all features requiring machining can be reached by standard tools. Standard tools have limited diameters and lengths; overly deep cavities or narrow slots may be inaccessible.
· Avoid overly deep cavities and narrow slots. The recommended depth-to-opening ratio for cavities is ≤3:1.
· Provide sufficient tool entry and exit clearance. Tools need space to safely enter and exit the machining area.
Standardizing feature sizes reduces tool changes and improves machining efficiency.
· Use the same diameter holes whenever possible to reduce tool changes. Each tool change requires time for calibration and testing.
· Use standard radius fillets to avoid custom tools. Standard fillets like R2, R3, R5 can be machined with standard end mills.
· Standardize thread sizes to reduce tool changes. Use common sizes like M3, M4, M5, M6 whenever possible.
Internal Fillets (Inside Corners):
· Avoid designing sharp internal corners; add fillets instead. Sharp internal corners cannot be machined with standard end mills and require EDM, increasing costs by 3-5 times.
· Fillet radii should be larger than the tool radius; standard sizes like R1, R2, R3, R5 are recommended. Using standard radii means standard end mills can be used.
· Sharp internal corners require EDM, which is costly and time-consuming.
External Fillets:
· External fillets have no special restrictions and can be machined with standard tools. External fillets can be achieved through chamfering or radius milling.
· External chamfers improve appearance and remove sharp edges. It is recommended to chamfer all external corners.
Design Recommendations:
· Recommended internal fillet radius ≥0.5mm. Smaller radii require smaller diameter tools, increasing machining time.
· Use standard radii consistently to reduce tool changes. R2 is the most commonly used internal fillet radius.
Minimum Wall Thickness Requirements:
· Metal parts: recommended ≥0.8-1.0mm. Aluminum parts can be as thin as 0.5-0.8mm but require special processes.
· Plastic parts: recommended ≥1.0-1.5mm. Plastic parts are prone to deformation and require thicker walls.
· Thin-walled parts are prone to deformation and difficult to machine. They tend to vibrate and deform under cutting forces, affecting precision and surface quality.
Wall Thickness Uniformity:
· Maintain uniform wall thickness as much as possible; avoid abrupt thickness changes. Abrupt changes cause stress concentration and post-machining deformation.
· Uneven wall thickness leads to stress concentration and deformation. Transition areas should have gradual slopes rather than sharp corners.
· Transition areas should be designed with gradual slopes. A slope ratio of ≥1:5 is recommended to reduce stress concentration.
Design Recommendations:
· Add reinforcing ribs to thin-walled parts to improve rigidity. Reinforcing ribs effectively increase rigidity and reduce deformation.
· Avoid overly thin cantilevered structures. Cantilevered structures vibrate easily during machining and are difficult to maintain precision.
Drilling Depth:
· Standard drills can machine depths of about 3-5 times the diameter. Beyond this depth, deep hole drilling or special processes are required.
· Deep holes (depth >5 times diameter) require special processes and increase costs. Deep hole drilling requires specialized equipment and tools, significantly increasing costs.
· Through holes are easier to machine than blind holes. Through holes allow tools to pass through, facilitate chip evacuation, and improve cooling.
Hole Types:
· Through holes: easy to machine, tools can pass through. Through holes are simple to machine and low cost.
· Blind holes: pay attention to the bottom shape, avoid sharp corners. Blind hole bottoms should be flat or have a 120° conical bottom.
· Threaded holes: consider thread depth and pilot hole diameter. Pilot hole diameters should follow standard calculations, and thread depth should be sufficient.
Hole Spacing and Edge Distance:
· Edge distance ≥1.5 times hole diameter. Insufficient edge distance can cause material cracking or deformation during machining.
· Hole spacing ≥2 times hole diameter. Insufficient spacing can cause insufficient material strength between adjacent holes.
· Holes that are too close can cause material cracking during machining, especially in thin-walled parts.
Design Recommendations:
· Use standard drill diameters whenever possible. Standard drill diameters include 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10mm, etc.
· Recommended threaded hole depth ≥1.5 times thread diameter. For example, M6 threaded hole, depth ≥9mm.
· Avoid overly deep small-diameter holes. Holes with diameter <3mm and depth >10mm are difficult to machine.
Thread Types:
· Metric threads (M series): most common, recommended. M3, M4, M5, M6, M8, M10 are the most commonly used sizes.
· Inch threads: used for US standard products. Such as UNC and UNF series.
· Pipe threads: used for sealing connections. Such as G1/4, G1/2, etc.
Thread Depth:
· Blind hole threads: effective depth ≥1.5 times thread diameter. For example, M6 thread, effective depth ≥9mm.
· Through hole threads: no depth limitation. Through hole threads are easier to machine and have higher strength.
· Pilot hole diameter: calculate according to standard. For example, M6 thread pilot hole diameter is 5.0mm.
Thread Runout:
· Blind hole threads should have undercuts or thread runout. Undercuts allow taps to exit safely and prevent thread end weakness.
· Avoid threads going to the very bottom; leave space for tool exit. It is recommended to leave 0.5-1 times thread diameter of runout space.
Design Recommendations:
· Use common sizes like M3, M4, M5, M6 whenever possible. These sizes have the most common taps and tools, resulting in the lowest cost.
· Avoid excessively shallow threads (<3 threads). Threads with fewer than 3 threads lack strength and are prone to stripping.
· Consider using threaded inserts for thin-walled parts. Threaded inserts increase thread strength and prevent stripping.
Challenges of Thin-Walled Parts:
· Vibration during machining affects precision and surface quality. Vibration leads to rough surfaces and dimensional deviations.
· Deformation during clamping. Excessive clamping force or improper clamping points can cause deformation.
· Cutting forces may cause part distortion. Especially for slender parts, cutting forces can easily cause distortion.
Design Optimization:
· Add reinforcing ribs to improve rigidity. Reinforcing ribs effectively increase rigidity and reduce vibration and deformation.
· Use symmetrical structures to balance stress. Symmetrical structures can offset machining stresses and reduce deformation.
· Wall thickness ≥1mm (metal), ≥1.5mm (plastic). Walls that are too thin are difficult to machine.
· Avoid large-area thin-walled flat surfaces. Large flat thin surfaces vibrate easily, making flatness difficult to achieve.
Machining Recommendations:
· Separate rough and finish machining to release stress. After rough machining, allow time for stress relief before finish machining.
· Use vacuum chucks or soft jaws for clamping. Vacuum chucks are suitable for thin plates; soft jaws reduce clamping deformation.
· Use high-speed machining to reduce cutting forces. High-speed machining reduces cutting forces and deformation.
Challenges of Deep Cavities:
· Limited tool length; long tools have poor rigidity. The longer the tool, the poorer the rigidity and the more prone to vibration.
· Difficulty with chip evacuation; can cause tool damage. Chips in deep cavities are difficult to evacuate and can accumulate, leading to tool damage.
· Bottom machining precision is hard to guarantee. Overly long tools reduce precision at the bottom.
Design Recommendations:
· Cavity depth-to-opening width ratio ≤3:1. For example, if opening width is 10mm, depth should be ≤30mm.
· Design cavity bottoms as flat or rounded. Sharp bottoms are difficult to machine and can damage tools.
· Avoid overly deep narrow slots. Recommended depth-to-width ratio for narrow slots ≤2:1.
Optimization Solutions:
· Split deep cavities into multiple parts. If deep cavities are unavoidable, consider splitting the structure and assembling after separate machining.
· Use EDM as an auxiliary process. EDM can machine extremely deep cavities and complex internal structures.
· Add draft angles to facilitate machining. Draft angles allow tools to enter and exit cavities more easily.
Issues with Sharp Corners:
· Sharp internal corners cannot be machined with standard tools. Sharp internal corners require EDM, which is costly.
· Sharp edges can cause injury and affect safety. Sharp edges may injure operators during handling or users during product use.
· Stress concentration at sharp corners leads to cracking. Sharp corners concentrate stress and are prone to cracking under load.
Design Recommendations:
· Chamfer or round all sharp edges. Recommended chamfer C0.2-C1.0, or fillet R0.5-R1.0.
· Add fillets to internal corners (R≥0.5mm). R2 is the most commonly used internal fillet radius.
· External corners can be chamfered C0.2-C1.0. External chamfers remove sharp edges and improve appearance.
Advantages:
· Easy to machine: aluminum alloys have good cutting performance and long tool life
· Dimensionally stable: minimal deformation after machining, stable precision
· Good surface treatment results: can be anodized in various colors
Considerations:
· Thin walls can be as thin as 0.5-0.8mm. However, cutting forces and clamping methods must be controlled.
· Suitable for complex structures and high precision requirements. Aluminum alloy is ideal for DFM optimization.
· Pay attention to machining stress deformation. Large thin-walled parts may deform after machining and require stress relief.
Challenges:
· Work hardening: stainless steel work-hardens during machining, increasing subsequent machining difficulty
· Rapid tool wear: requires frequent tool changes
· High cutting heat: requires adequate cooling
Considerations:
· Wall thickness should be ≥1mm. Walls that are too thin are prone to deformation.
· Avoid overly deep small holes and narrow slots. Deep hole machining is difficult and prone to tool breakage.
· Increase tool accessibility in design. Provide sufficient tool entry and exit clearance.
Advantages:
· Lightweight: low density, suitable for lightweighting requirements
· Insulating: good electrical insulation properties
· Low cost: low material cost, high machining efficiency
Considerations:
· Wall thickness should be ≥1.5mm; avoid being too thin. Plastic parts have poor rigidity and thin walls deform easily.
· Pay attention to material moisture absorption and thermal expansion. Materials like nylon change dimensions after moisture absorption.
· Avoid sharp internal corners to prevent stress cracking. Plastic parts are prone to cracking at sharp corners.
· Soft materials like PTFE are difficult to achieve high precision. Soft materials deform easily during machining, making precision control difficult.
Challenges:
· Difficult to machine: low cutting speeds, rapid tool wear
· Difficult precision control: high thermal deformation, high machining stresses
· High cost: both material and machining costs are high
Considerations:
· Wall thickness should be ≥1.5mm. Titanium alloy thin-walled parts are even more prone to deformation.
· Avoid complex deep cavity structures. Complex structures are difficult to machine.
· Reserve sufficient machining allowance. Titanium alloy may deform after machining, requiring allowance for finish machining.
· Design parts to be machined on multiple faces in one setup. 5-axis machining allows multiple faces to be machined in a single setup.
· Use 5-axis machining to reduce setups. 5-axis machining can handle complex spatial angles, reducing setups.
· Add datums to facilitate positioning. Clear datums simplify clamping and alignment.
· Use fillet radii that are half of standard tool diameters. For example, an R2 fillet can be machined with a φ4 end mill.
· Use standard drill diameters for holes. Standard drill diameters include 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10mm, etc.
· Use standard thread sizes. M3, M4, M5, M6 are the most common thread sizes.
· Replace complex surfaces with flat surfaces. Flat surfaces are simple to machine and low cost.
· Replace custom shapes with standard shapes. Circles, squares, rectangles are easier to machine than freeform surfaces.
· Reduce unnecessary finished surfaces. Only surfaces that require finishing for functional reasons need to be finished.
· Combine multiple parts into a single integrated structure. Integrated structures reduce assembly steps and fasteners.
· Reduce assembly steps and fasteners. Each part and each fastener adds cost.
· Increase overall strength. Integrated structures are stronger than assembled structures.
· Prioritize free-cutting materials. Such as 6061 aluminum alloy, 303 stainless steel, brass.
· Choose lower-cost materials that still meet functional requirements. Avoid choosing expensive materials for unnecessary performance.
· Consider material availability. Common materials are easier to source and generally lower in cost.
· Only specify tight tolerances for critical dimensions. Use general tolerances for non-critical dimensions.
· Use general tolerances for non-functional surfaces. ISO 2768-mK is the most common default tolerance.
· Avoid unnecessary geometric tolerances. Geometric tolerances like flatness and perpendicularity increase inspection costs.

Design Feature | CNC Machining | 3D Printing |
Complex Internal Structures | Difficult to machine | Easy to achieve |
High Precision Requirements | Suitable | Lower precision |
Metal Materials | Suitable | High cost |
High-Volume Production | Suitable | Not suitable |
Thin-Walled Structures | Prone to deformation | Can be very thin |
Surface Finish | Good | Fair |
Choose CNC Machining When:
· High precision required (±0.01mm or better)
· Metal materials
· Batch production (10+ parts)
· Good surface quality required
· Material properties needed (strength, temperature resistance, etc.)
Choose 3D Printing When:
· Complex internal structures (lattices, flow channels)
· Rapid prototyping (1-10 parts)
· Plastic parts
· Low-volume customization
· Design requires fast iteration
Combining Both:
For complex parts, consider 3D printing for prototype validation and CNC machining for production. Complex internal structures can be 3D printed while external structures are CNC machined.
Problem: Cannot be machined with standard tools; requires EDM, increasing costs by 3-5 times.
Improvement: Add R2 or R3 fillets. R2 fillets can be machined with φ4 end mills at low cost.
Problem: Deformation and vibration during machining, difficult to maintain precision, high scrap rate.
Improvement: Increase wall thickness to at least 1mm, or add reinforcing ribs. Reinforcing ribs effectively increase rigidity and reduce deformation.
Problem: Difficult deep hole machining, prone to tool breakage, difficult chip evacuation.
Improvement: Change to through holes, or add undercuts. Through holes are easier to machine and facilitate chip evacuation.
Problem: Insufficient thread strength, prone to stripping, assembly failure.
Improvement: Thread depth ≥1.5 times thread diameter. For example, M6 thread, depth ≥9mm.
Problem: Tool cannot reach machining area, requiring special fixtures or multiple setups.
Improvement: Add tool entry/exit clearance, or split the structure. Provide sufficient space for tools.
· 3D Models: STEP (.stp) format preferred. STEP is an international standard compatible with almost all CAD software.
· 2D Drawings: PDF (including tolerance requirements). PDF ensures consistent display across different devices.
· Alternative Formats: IGES, SolidWorks, X_T, DWG, DXF.
· Material specification and grade: such as 6061-T6 aluminum alloy, 304 stainless steel
· Surface treatment requirements: such as black anodizing, blue-white zinc plating
· Critical dimension tolerances: such as φ10±0.01, flatness 0.02
· Geometric tolerances: such as parallelism, perpendicularity, coaxiality
· Special requirements: such as no burrs, chamfer C0.5 on sharp edges, thread protection
· State critical requirements during the quoting phase. Clear communication allows suppliers to accurately assess processes and costs.
· Provide functional descriptions and assembly relationships. Help suppliers understand design intent for better DFM suggestions.
· Accept supplier DFM feedback. Supplier feedback helps optimize designs and reduce costs.
· Confirm process feasibility before mass production. Avoid discovering design issues after production begins.
Metal parts: recommended ≥0.8-1.0mm; plastic parts: recommended ≥1.0-1.5mm. Aluminum parts can be as thin as 0.5mm but require special processes and careful operation. Thin-walled parts are prone to deformation; adding reinforcing ribs is recommended to improve rigidity.
Internal fillet radii should be larger than the tool radius; standard sizes like R1, R2, R3, R5 are recommended. Very small fillets (such as R0.5) require small diameter tools and increase machining time. R2 is the most commonly used internal fillet radius, machinable with a φ4 end mill.
Blind hole threads: recommended effective depth ≥1.5 times thread diameter. For example, M6 thread, depth ≥9mm; M8 thread, depth ≥12mm. Through hole threads have no limitations and are easier to machine. Threads that are too shallow (<3 threads) lack strength and are prone to stripping.
· Simplify designs and reduce complex features
· Use standard tools and standard sizes
· Only specify tight tolerances for critical dimensions
· Combine parts and reduce assembly
· Choose free-cutting materials (such as 6061 aluminum alloy, 303 stainless steel)
If high precision, metal materials, and batch production are needed, choose CNC machining. If your part has complex internal structures, rapid prototyping needs, or is plastic, choose 3D printing. They can also be combined: 3D printing for prototype validation, CNC machining for production.
Send your drawings to an experienced CNC machining supplier. They can provide DFM feedback, identifying potential design issues and suggesting optimizations. Brightstar offers free DFM evaluation services.
· Sharp internal corners (require EDM)
· Overly thin walls (prone to deformation)
· Overly deep small holes (difficult to machine)
· Areas that tools cannot reach
· Unnecessary tight tolerances (increase costs)
· Increase wall thickness or add reinforcing ribs
· Use symmetrical structures to balance stress
· Separate rough and finish machining to release stress
· Choose appropriate clamping methods (vacuum chucks, soft jaws)
Send your drawings to Brightstar. Our engineers will provide free DFM evaluation, including structural optimization suggestions, material selection recommendations, and cost optimization solutions. Please send STEP format 3D models to amy@brightstarprototype.com.
The earlier design changes are made, the lower the cost impact. Optimization during the design phase can reduce costs by 20-50%, while changes during the machining phase may require rework and cause delays. It is recommended to complete design optimization before mass production.
· Does the supplier provide DFM feedback during the quoting phase? Good suppliers will identify potential design issues during quoting.
· Can they identify potential design issues? Including structural, tolerance, and material issues.
· Can they provide optimization recommendations? Not just identifying problems but also offering solutions.
· Does the supplier have a professional engineering team? The engineering team should understand design intent and provide professional advice.
· Are they willing to communicate design intent with designers? Good suppliers actively communicate to ensure understanding of design requirements.
· Do they provide technical support in multiple languages? Facilitates communication with international customers.
Brightstar provides professional DFM technical support:
· Experienced engineering team familiar with various materials and processes
· DFM feedback provided during quoting to help optimize designs
· Assistance with design optimization, cost reduction, and manufacturability improvement
· Material selection and process recommendations
· One-stop service (design optimization + machining + surface finishing)
Good design is key to CNC machining success. This article systematically introduces design principles and best practices for CNC machining, including design guidelines for common features such as fillets, wall thickness, holes, threads, and thin-walled parts, as well as cost-reducing design strategies.
By following these design guidelines, you can:
· Improve part manufacturability and reduce machining difficulty
· Lower machining costs and shorten lead times
· Reduce design rework and scrap rates
· Achieve higher quality parts
Get Free DFM Evaluation Now
Send your drawings to Brightstar. Our engineers will provide you with:
· Structural optimization recommendations
· Material selection recommendations
· Process feasibility analysis
· Cost optimization solutions
· Free DFM evaluation report
Contact Information
Phone / WeChat: +86-13750105351
Email: amy@brightstarprototype.com
Website: www.brightstarcnc.com
Online Chat: Click the chat window in the bottom right corner to upload your drawings directly.
Brightstar is a professional CNC machining service provider specializing in high-precision, high-quality precision part machining for global clients. We have:
· High-precision 3-axis, 4-axis, and 5-axis CNC machining centers
· ISO 9001:2015 quality management system certification
· Professional DFM technical support team
· Extensive design optimization experience
· One-stop service (design optimization + machining + surface finishing)
No matter what stage of product design you are in, Brightstar provides professional DFM support to help you optimize designs, reduce costs, and accelerate time to market.
Contact us today to make your designs easier to machine and more cost-effective.